Pages

Thursday, February 23, 2012

First Line Grabber #15

TITLE: Heaven and Hell Alike
GENRE: Paranormal Fantasy

When Liam took over the body of a railroad worker fifty years ago, he hadn't realized he'd suffer from caffeine withdrawal every morning.

52 comments:

  1. Yes
    But almost no. 50 years seems like time enough to get used to something like caffeine desire upon waking. So, I am left wondering why after 50 years this is the most important thing. But, I would read on a bit to see where it was going.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes.
    I like the quirkiness - even though I don't usually read paranormal, I like the idea of a supernatural creature dealing with everyday mortal struggles.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes, the idea is cute enough to draw me forward, even if the sentence itself could use some tightening.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No. I don't know exactly why other than caffeine withdrawal isn't something you suffer from every morning. You suffer for awhile, then it goes away (usually). It feels like that's thrown in to hook us into what's infinitely more interesting: that Liam has taken over a body, and it's a railroad worker - so I'd like to know more about that than the caffeine, then I'd say yes :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes, but I'm on the fence, the sentence is a little wordy.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No.

    I love the taking oer the body idea, but the caffeine withdrawl would pass, after fifty years.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, but like some others, I'm waffling between yes and no. I think you could probably streamline this a bit to make it crisper.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes, I still think it needs work but it's got action, emotion and gives me an idea of the voice.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No. I like the idea of him having taking over someone else's body almost 50 years ago, but i agree that the caffeine withdrawal isn't enough of a hook to make me think it lasted 50 years.

    However, if it was something more ritualistic - the withdrawal of something that goes with caffeine like how the mc enjoyed it, that would make a big difference and add to voice.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Yes. I'm also wondering why the caffeine withdrawal doesn't go away, but the sentence intrigued me overall.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No.

    I like the idea of the body switching but the caffeine withdrawal detail isn't enough to keep me reading.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No.

    This just leaves me confused. What does taking over the body of a railroad worker have to do with caffeine withdrawl? And has he been suffering from it for all fifty years since he did this because that sounds a little bit impossible?

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes.

    To see what happens next.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes. Taking over another person' body is intriging. However, I'm wondering why the caffeine addiction has lasted fifty years.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes but I'm on the fence as well - the sentence needs to be tightened.

    I'm addicted enough to caffeine to take the rest at face value.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes. It's kind of quirky, and it's already got a pretty decent voice.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No. After being in someone for 50 years you'd either get used to caffeine withdrawals or they would go away. I don't think they would continue to bother someone for so long. However, I do like the premise of taking over a body and would be pulled to learn more about that.

    ReplyDelete
  18. No.
    Intrigued by the posession thing, but the implausibility of a 50 year caffeine addition is overpowered by the boredom of working on the railroad for 50 years. It might be more interesting to know Liam's opinion on that!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes.
    I love anything with intrigue in the first line.

    ReplyDelete
  20. No. The sentence is cumbersome and awkward (imo).

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yes. While the line doesn't exactly hook me, it's amusing enough that I'd keep reading.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Yes but barely. The immediacy of the story is watered down by the '50 years ago'

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yes! I get a sense of the story's direction right away, and I like the wry humor.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Yes. I assume that because he still feels the withdrawal, that he feeds that addiction every day (or it wouldn't continue). I like the thought of a demon or ghost feeling the mundane withdrawals of the body it took. I'd read on.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes, I'm curious. But the next few lines would have to be good to keep me going with it.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No. This feels to me like a sentence that should come later on the first page. Maybe it could start with him feeling the familiar feeling of caffeine withdrawal when he wakes up? Although I'm a bit confused, because if this has been going on for 50 years, I'd kind think he'd be used to it by now.

    Good luck!

    ReplyDelete
  27. No.
    Mostly personal preference. Possession doesn't really excite me and a caffeine addicted railroad worker doesn't either. I'd like to know more about Liam because I think he's the one I'd care about. I want to feel something and this one just doesn't grab me. That doesn't mean it's wrong, just that it isn't for me.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Yes.

    But a weak one.

    The "When blah, blah, blah fifty years again, he hadn't blah, blah, blah" construction makes this feel like the tagline for a book about a coffee addiction rather than the beginning of a compelling scene.

    Still, I liked the concept of a [whatever] powerful enough to possess someone but still chained to a coffee cup every morning to keep reading.

    I would try to keep the idea of the opening but rework the sentence so that the reader feel more a part of the moment and not like she's being told about things that happened way back when.

    ReplyDelete
  29. My initial reaction is Yes, so that's my vote. It initially made me laugh, and I certainly would have read on.

    However, as I look at it more closely, it does raise some plausibility questions. (Why caffiene withdrawal for fifty years, why is caffiene such a big deal, etc.) I have a feeling an agent or editor would change it. So keep that in mind.

    ReplyDelete
  30. No. I think it was trying to be funny, but fell a little flat for me.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Yes. To me the point was that taking over someone's body isn't always what it's cracked up to be! I didn't have a problem with the caffeine addiction, because I've known many, many people (who aren't body snatchers even) that get caffeine headaches every day before their first cuppa. I'd read on.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yes. Very funny. Also I'm assuming Liam suffers only until he drinks that morning cup.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yes, but it was almost too much info for the first line. Still, I'd read on!

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yes!

    I've read this before around the blogosphere and it hooked me then, too. I know nothing about caffeine addiction, though, so I can't comment on plausibility. I laughed. Laughing is good. :)

    ReplyDelete
  35. No. If he took the body over 50 years ago, why is he just noticing the caffeine withdrawal now? Plus, I found myself checking out the title, figuring that Liam must be a demon and then wondering what sort of demon was called Liam.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Yes. It's a little bit awkward and not altogether there for me, but I'm still interested about where this is going.

    ReplyDelete
  37. No. The voice is too passive, and you are not pulling me into the story.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Yes. It could be tightened, but I really, really like it. :) It's very intriguing and something I can definitely relate to.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Yes, because I like the humor. It's a little disorienting with the "fifty years ago" part, though, and I wonder if that detail could be saved for the next sentence?

    ReplyDelete
  40. No. I'm also confused about the caffeine and disoriented in time.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Yes.
    It made me laugh, and now I want to know about who's taking over bodies, and why.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yes. Interesting quirk on the usual body-snatching theme. Though thinking about it, fifty years of caffeine withdrawal?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yes. I am hooked! I want to know how he took over another persons body,and why he would suffer caffeine withdrawel?

    ReplyDelete
  44. No.

    So he's been suffering from withdrawl for fifty years? That doesn't seem believable to me.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yes. I like the voice, although I'm similarly a little confused as the other commenters why he is suffering caffeine w/d for 50years. Then again, in fantasy, you make the rules. Maybe a paranormal taking over a body never adjusts to it. If this were explained in the next sentences I think it's fine.

    ReplyDelete
  46. No. I agree with others - 50 years is a long time to have caffeine withdrawal, and why can't the railroad worker have caffeine, anyway?

    ReplyDelete
  47. No. If the story started when Liam took over the body I'd be intrigued, but after 50 years, I'm wondering what is going to be new about this particular moment. Plus, of all the things that could be a problem when taking over a body, caffeine withdrawal seems among the less interesting, at least to me.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Yes.

    I like the voice. Also, regarding the caffeine: instantly relatable. My first thought was: 50 years? But then my next thought was: maybe once Liam takes over a body, it stays exactly how it was when the last soul left it, so he's stuck with caffeine withdrawal forever. This is paranormal, after all. See, you got me thinking, with just once sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  49. No.

    Maybe if you said "caffeine craving" instead of "caffeine withdrawal," it would resolve some of the plausibility issues, but even so, that's too a trivial problem to hook me.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Yes was my initial reaction, because it was quirky and funny. But I agree with everyone else that caffeine withdrawal, even cravings, for 50 years is unlikely. I've heard some people say they still have nicotine cravings after many years, though.

    ReplyDelete