Pages

Thursday, February 23, 2012

First Line Grabber #5

TITLE: RUIN
GENRE: YA

Mama decided to name me Ruin when she found out she was pregnant because she knew I'd ruin her life.

53 comments:

  1. No
    would have preferred "thought" to "knew". It sends up red flags that it might be a "whoa is me" narrator and that makes me stop.

    ReplyDelete
  2. No. It is almost there. Tighten it and add some voice.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yes
    Makes me curious about the relationship of the mother and her child when it starts out so bad.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No.

    It's so close but the writing needs to be tightened a bit to give it the punch it needs.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No. Not yet, anyway. Sentence needs tightening up but the voice is there.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No, in one sentence it strikes me as the type of book I wouldn't like.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No.

    The doubling of 'ruin'throws me off.
    ...because she knew it's what I'd do to her life. Not sure. Or another word for ruin secondly would have changed my opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Yes. I'd read on, but hopefully by the end of the paragraph I'd feel like the writing gets smoother. I agree that "Ruin" being used twice here makes it a bit clunky (especially since it's also the title). But I like the idea of that name for an MC, so I'd like to read more.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes but I think the sentence is too long.

    ReplyDelete
  10. No. Sentence is too long and for me it gives to much away. I'd rather find out about their relationship through the story instead of being told.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No. It's too drawn out and doesn't leave much tension for the rest of the story.

    However, this could be an interesting logline when you get that far.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No, but it's sooo close. I think it can be tightened up and it would be a much stronger opening line. Great concept, just lost in too many words.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No.

    It's SO close. It definitely needs to be tightened. I don't even know if you need the last part of that sentence.

    "When she found out she was pregnant, Mama decided to name me Ruin." or something along those lines.

    With a name like "Ruin" I think readers can make that intuitive leap with you. You don't need to explain, at least not in the same sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  14. No. Agree this is close but the use of ruin twice in the first sentence doesnt work for me.

    ReplyDelete
  15. No.

    It's really close though. I think you need to get rid of the "when she found out she was pregnant" because it makes it sound like this is about her finding out she is pregnant when that is probably irrelevant. If you just said, "Mama said she named me Ruin because she knew I'd ruin her life" this would be MUCH stronger.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No. It went on a little too long. Short and sweet in this sentiment would work a lot better for me. I think if you took out "she found out she was pregnant" it would work.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No. I was on the fence about it, though. I think there are some opportunities to simplify and punch this up a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  18. No, but it's close. I think you can leave out a lot details here and still have them be implied. phrases like 'when she found out she was pregnant' slow the sentence down. Maybe something more like 'Mama named me Ruin because she knew what I'd do to her life'

    ReplyDelete
  19. No. Too long, needs to be tightened, and I'm not a fan of openings that begin by explaining names. Personal preference, but it always makes me think of Forrest Gump.

    ReplyDelete
  20. No. For me, the sentence sounds fine--it's not clunky. The fact that you use ruin twice is for effect so I'm with you there. I say no because the meaning behind the sentence seems trite to me. There are a lot of books in which someone is named something negative because their parents didn't want them. For instance, Six on the show Blossom was named Six because that's the number of beers it took her dad to drink to create her.

    ReplyDelete
  21. No

    I like the implication, but it needs immediacy. "I was named Ruin because Mama knew I'd ruin her life."

    ReplyDelete
  22. No. Would work better without using ruin in the sentence as well. Maybe tell us the predicament mom is in when she gets pregnant and then announce the name.

    ReplyDelete
  23. No. Awkwardly worded, but I love the idea!

    ReplyDelete
  24. No - you could definitely shorten the sentence as others have suggested and that would help. Is this apocalyptic?

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes. Because I'm hooked. But ouch! I wonder if there might be a gentler way to set this up before socking the reader with this information.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No.

    I think this sentence has too many ideas in it (five verb phrases) to make for an attention-grabbing line. Also, I think it tells too much. The "hook" is that her mother named her Ruin. Then you announce why that is. The only question we have left is how, and at this point, I'm assuming the usual.

    I think something shorter and simpler will have more impact: "When I was born, Mama named me Ruin."

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yes. This is sad, but also makes me want to know more of the MCs story - how did having to bear this awful name affect the MC?

    ReplyDelete
  28. No. Love the concept, but the sentence is a bit clumsy.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Yes- the voice alone draws me in, but to name a kid Ruin, I gotta read more.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Yes.
    I think this gives a nice sense of your voice. I do think you could break it into two sentences to give it more punch, but it reminds me of how Neil Gaiman names characters.

    ReplyDelete
  31. No. It feels too melodramatic for me -- the speaker using "Mama" (implied affection rather than resentment) to refer to her mother, who named her child "Ruin."

    ReplyDelete
  32. Yes. What a bummer of an opener...but I'm still intrigued. I'd read on one or two more sentences to see where you're going with this.

    ReplyDelete
  33. No. It's so close though! I love the idea behind it, and think you're probably a small tweak away from nailing it. I think the repetition of the same word (ruin) within a single sentence is off-putting.

    ReplyDelete
  34. No. It feels like it's trying to hard for me. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  35. No. I'm not sure I would enjoy this story. Kind of harsh.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Yes. The voice is interesting. I'd at least read a little more to see if there was enough character development early on. If you made me care about Ruin quickly, I'd read the whole book.

    ReplyDelete
  37. No, the sentence is awkward. A stronger sentence could be: Mama named me Ruin. That smacks of "My name is Ishmael" but it is more to the point and attention grabbing. I do want to know who your MC deals with her name and the teasing she's bound to get and how that affects her relationship with her mom. So, while your sentence didn't grab me, the situation and unusual name of your MC did.

    ReplyDelete
  38. No. Too sad for me personally, but that's personal preference. On the technical side, it's too wordy. Is "when she found out she was pregnant" a salient point? Perhaps it is, but if it's not, then I'd ditch it. And "because she knew I'd ruin her life" seems unnecessary to explain.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Yes. I like the implications. But a bit of a mouthful. I think it can be made smoother.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I agree with the comment directly above-- YES for the concept and just tighten the wording.

    ReplyDelete
  41. No. Wording is more important to me than the idea. I love the idea, though!

    ReplyDelete
  42. No, but it's close. I love the concept, LOVE the character name, but it felt a bit too angsty for me.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yes! I immeidately want to know how Ruin's life went. I already despise the mother for blaming her child in that way, and want to cheer Ruin on.

    ReplyDelete
  44. No.

    Word choice of 'mama' bugs me - it's the sort of thing I associate with a very very young child. Trying to phrase this right, I think if that's the sort of attitude the narrator & her mother have, I don't think it's a story that would interest me.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Narrow yes. The backstory intrigues me just enough to keep me reading.

    ReplyDelete
  46. No. Too wordy. But I like the idea and where it could be headed.

    ReplyDelete
  47. No. Good advice above on smoothing out the prose and possibly breaking into multiple sentences.

    ReplyDelete
  48. No. "When she found out she was pregnant" isn't necessary. Also the voice comes off as a bit whiny.

    ReplyDelete
  49. No. I agree with the others - too wordy.

    ReplyDelete
  50. No. The sentiment is there, but should be tweaked a bit. I hope you can find a way to say this in a dynamic way.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Yes. The use of the word 'mama' made me think this was a girl who had grown up in the south. I immediately saw this bitter, chain-smoking, trailer-park mom calling her Ruin (in a southern accent) and I wanted to hear her story.

    I agree that it could be cleaner - perhaps just another word for "ruin" instead of using it twice.

    ReplyDelete
  52. No. I agree that using 'Ruin' twice doesn't work. Something like, "My mother named me after the effect I would have on her life: Ruin' or something like that would be better.

    ReplyDelete
  53. No.

    Because I just can't believe it. I know there are bad parents in the world, but naming the child Ruin doesn't ring true to me. And I don't think I could read a whole book about a character named Ruin.

    ReplyDelete