I would prefer a "that" before "monsters" but otherwise, I think this is good. It's simple but it establishes a character with a problem right off the bat.
Yes. People have already said it, but I can say it again. I love how this line hints at so much in so few words! When you combine that with the fact it's a YA paranormal, I'd read on for sure to see where it goes.
No, gut instinct. Rereading it, I'd call it a maybe. No is because the line seems a bit odd... why wouldn't monsters be able to get him if someone loved him? I don't think monsters would care!
The maybe comes into play after reading some of the other comments. Maybe I'm missing something--like a familiarity with the genre?
Yes. It did almost sound MG, as Amy said, but the hinting of a romantic plot puts it back in YA territory for me. Although, then it makes me worried that this is "just another YA paranormal romance" (however unfair that expectation is. So, I'll say that yes, this works, but then, you could probobly get something that works BETTER. Find an approach that highlights how your book is unique.
Yes but just barely. I'd like to see a little more immediacy of tension by adding something like, 'boy was he wrong' or something else to bring it into the now.
Yes. I immediately started thinking that the narrator no longer has someone to love him/her (is the dad dead?) and was curious to find out if the monsters have now come calling.
I love simple lines that imply a lot. It seems very bittersweet. This gives me hints at a comforting father/child relationship, but the "used to" makes me wonder whether the father had died and now that the MC has no one's love, the monsters are moving in. I also wonder what kind of monsters we're dealing with, here.
The line, though, leads me to hope the MC will gain someone else's love to help combat the monsters--except the genre is YA paranormal and not paranormal romance, so I'm not sure what to expect.
Yes. It tells quite a lot in a very few words. She has a father who loved her, there are monsters to be afraid of, and there's the hint that something bad is most definitely about to happen.
Sounds like a cool coming-of age story, in which the MC realizes that, even when someone loves you, monsters can come anyway. I totally disagree that it sounds MG, it didn't really sound sweet to me (unless it was just the sweet before the sour) and I'm okay without the "that" before "monsters." Just saying.
I'm curious what is going to happen next. Is a monster coming? Is one person going to love her? Was her dad wrong? I get the feeling danger is coming and I like it.
Yes. First and foremost, I think it's adorable. On top of that, I want to know more about the relationship between the MC and the father. I want to know if there are monsters. I'm curious, which is a great reaction to get from a reader at the beginning of a book.
Yes. This did get my attention and I would like to read more. I agree that the word 'that' should go before the word monsters and the word 'used' makes it sound like the father is deceased or maybe missing? and not sure about the 'so long' shouldn't this be 'as long'
Yes. I want to read more, find out why this love can save/protect the narrator and learn more about the monsters. Starts like a typical child's memory, but more. So yes because it definitely gets my attention.
Yes, but a hesitant one. I thought it was sweet, but sounded more MG than YA. Also borderline cliche. But it was a simple and clean set up, which I liked.
Yes. It shows us in very few words about the relationship between the father and daughter. The 'used to' intrigued me too. Is Dad not around anymore, or does he just not say this? And the fact the MC is mentioning this now suggests that there is a monster in the near future, especially given the genre.
Yes. it grabs me. I like the "so long" and your voice. I want to know what kind of circumstances would have to exist for a dad to say that to their child. I see you are writing a paranormal-- so my suggestion would be to put the word "the" in there with monsters maybe? like "the monsters couldn't get me" don't know if that works with your story, but it sounds more specific, rather than the standard monsters under the bed that spring to mind... good luck!
No. It's clear and suggests that you probably have a good handle with story telling, but the line by itself didn't hook me. It's possible the first paragraph will, but the first line didn't.
Yes
ReplyDeleteIn so few words, the author presents danger, a loving father, and an implication that things have changed
Yes. At first I thought the sentence was going to end in a cliché, and then you turned it around to something lovely!
ReplyDeleteYes.
ReplyDeleteI would prefer a "that" before "monsters" but otherwise, I think this is good. It's simple but it establishes a character with a problem right off the bat.
Yes. Liked the premise and that there's a problem.
ReplyDeleteYes
ReplyDeleteNice inclusion of a relationship while also making me wonder what the danger is.
Yes
ReplyDeleteThis is clear and makes me want to read more. I agree with Holly about adding "that" into the sentence.
Yes. Now I want to know if her dad was right and whether the monsters got her anyway.
ReplyDeleteYes. It's got voice, it's got a sense of foreboding, and a kind of melancholy/creepy feeling.
ReplyDeleteYes. Especially since it's YA paranormal this sets a fun, but ominous, tone.
ReplyDeleteYes, what monster is after this person now?
ReplyDeleteYes.
ReplyDeleteFor sure a yes. Simple. To the point. And what are the monsters? Sounds good.
Yes. Conflict, danger, and the promise of the story all wrapped up in one little sentence.
ReplyDeleteYes, I don't really need to say more! I want to read on!
ReplyDeleteYes. Touching first line with a feeling of tension at the same time.
ReplyDeleteYes. People have already said it, but I can say it again. I love how this line hints at so much in so few words! When you combine that with the fact it's a YA paranormal, I'd read on for sure to see where it goes.
ReplyDeleteYes!
ReplyDeleteSimple, but so much said.
Yes.
ReplyDeleteEven though the sentence itself doesn't create conflict, it implies the conflict will be revealed. I just hope it's soon. Like...the next sentence.
Yes. Sentimental and original, and sets up future conflict.
ReplyDeleteYes. I agree with Holly to add: that before monsters, but I would read on. Nice!
ReplyDeleteYes. The sentence sets up so many possibilities. I would read on. Like others said I would add that before monsters.
ReplyDeleteYes. Love this. I'm pulled right in because I want this person to have someone to love them. So, I care right away. Great job.
ReplyDeleteNo, gut instinct. Rereading it, I'd call it a maybe. No is because the line seems a bit odd... why wouldn't monsters be able to get him if someone loved him? I don't think monsters would care!
ReplyDeleteThe maybe comes into play after reading some of the other comments. Maybe I'm missing something--like a familiarity with the genre?
Yes! This makes me wonder why the Dad "used to" insist - did something happen to prove him wrong? Id keep reading to find out.
ReplyDeleteNo.
ReplyDeleteIt voice sounded MG to me.
Yes. It did almost sound MG, as Amy said, but the hinting of a romantic plot puts it back in YA territory for me. Although, then it makes me worried that this is "just another YA paranormal romance" (however unfair that expectation is. So, I'll say that yes, this works, but then, you could probobly get something that works BETTER. Find an approach that highlights how your book is unique.
ReplyDeleteYes but just barely. I'd like to see a little more immediacy of tension by adding something like, 'boy was he wrong' or something else to bring it into the now.
ReplyDeleteYes! Compelling, with terror and tenderness combined.
ReplyDeleteYes. Sets up a tender father-child bond right from the start and gears us up to be ready for those monsters not to be following that love theory.
ReplyDeleteYes. It does a lot in a few words. I think the implication that Dad was wrong is very clear. I don't think you need to add to that.
ReplyDeleteYes. In just these few words you've shown something important about the character's relationship with his/her father. Nice.
ReplyDeleteYes. I'm missing a 'that' in front of monsters, too, but that doesn't kill the great build-up. I feel sorry for the person(and scared) already.
ReplyDeleteYes. I'm intrigued by the concept here, and the writing is clear. Next sentence, please!
ReplyDeleteAlthough I do agree that a "that" before monsters would be an improvement.
ReplyDeleteYes. The relationship between the father and child is immediately clear and I'm worried about what monster proved Dad wrong.
ReplyDeleteYes. I immediately started thinking that the narrator no longer has someone to love him/her (is the dad dead?) and was curious to find out if the monsters have now come calling.
ReplyDeleteYes. This has voice and intrigue. I want to read more. Well done.
ReplyDeleteYes. Way to set up for disappointment, though, Dad.
ReplyDeleteYes, because I think it's sweet.
ReplyDeleteNo. But I'm not particularly partial to monster stories either, so the voice was not enough to draw me in.
ReplyDeleteYes.
ReplyDeleteI love simple lines that imply a lot. It seems very bittersweet. This gives me hints at a comforting father/child relationship, but the "used to" makes me wonder whether the father had died and now that the MC has no one's love, the monsters are moving in. I also wonder what kind of monsters we're dealing with, here.
The line, though, leads me to hope the MC will gain someone else's love to help combat the monsters--except the genre is YA paranormal and not paranormal romance, so I'm not sure what to expect.
Yes. Really nice sense of tension set up here.
ReplyDeleteI like the set up that love is safety.
ReplyDeleteYes. I think it's sweet, although it may read as a bit too sweet for some.
ReplyDeleteYes, threat (that we all can relate to) and the loophole/escape clause with the hint that a problem looms.
ReplyDeleteYes, it's very sweet and slightly ominous.
ReplyDeleteYes. It tells quite a lot in a very few words. She has a father who loved her, there are monsters to be afraid of, and there's the hint that something bad is most definitely about to happen.
ReplyDeleteYes!!
ReplyDeleteSounds like a cool coming-of age story, in which the MC realizes that, even when someone loves you, monsters can come anyway. I totally disagree that it sounds MG, it didn't really sound sweet to me (unless it was just the sweet before the sour) and I'm okay without the "that" before "monsters." Just saying.
Excellent sentence.
Yes.
ReplyDeleteI'm curious what is going to happen next. Is a monster coming? Is one person going to love her? Was her dad wrong? I get the feeling danger is coming and I like it.
Yes. This raises so many questions!
ReplyDeleteYes. It's making a big promise for the story right away.
ReplyDeleteYes. It's familiar, yet different. Will draw in the audience you want. It's a good start to a paranormal story.
ReplyDeleteYes. First and foremost, I think it's adorable. On top of that, I want to know more about the relationship between the MC and the father. I want to know if there are monsters. I'm curious, which is a great reaction to get from a reader at the beginning of a book.
ReplyDeleteyes. i was drawn to a sense of sadness and the use of this sadness as foreshadowing of something dire.
ReplyDeleteYes. This did get my attention and I would like to read more. I agree that the word 'that' should go before the word monsters and the word 'used' makes it sound like the father is deceased or maybe missing? and not sure about the 'so long' shouldn't this be 'as long'
ReplyDeleteYes. I want to read more, find out why this love can save/protect the narrator and learn more about the monsters. Starts like a typical child's memory, but more. So yes because it definitely gets my attention.
ReplyDeleteYes. It raises a lot of story questions to entice me to read on.
ReplyDeleteYes, but a hesitant one. I thought it was sweet, but sounded more MG than YA. Also borderline cliche. But it was a simple and clean set up, which I liked.
ReplyDeleteNo. The sentence feels a bit awkward at the end, "so long as one person loved me."
ReplyDeleteWhat would be more clear to me: "Dad used to insist that monsters couldn't get me as long as I was loved."
Yes. This one was great, plus I knew right off the bat it was YA without seeing the genre.
ReplyDeleteYes. It shows us in very few words about the relationship between the father and daughter. The 'used to' intrigued me too. Is Dad not around anymore, or does he just not say this? And the fact the MC is mentioning this now suggests that there is a monster in the near future, especially given the genre.
ReplyDeleteYes. it grabs me. I like the "so long" and your voice. I want to know what kind of circumstances would have to exist for a dad to say that to their child. I see you are writing a paranormal-- so my suggestion would be to put the word "the" in there with monsters maybe? like "the monsters couldn't get me" don't know if that works with your story, but it sounds more specific, rather than the standard monsters under the bed that spring to mind... good luck!
ReplyDeleteYes, but I'm nervous. Did something happen to Dad? Is something going to happen to him? I'd read on, but I'm already trembling.
ReplyDeleteYes.
ReplyDeleteI like how this first sentence gives us a sense of emotion, the main character and looming conflict right away.
No. It's clear and suggests that you probably have a good handle with story telling, but the line by itself didn't hook me. It's possible the first paragraph will, but the first line didn't.
ReplyDelete