Pages

Thursday, June 27, 2013

First Sentence #50

TITLE: The Saline Solution
GENRE: YA Contemporary

Sunday night was always forensic night at the Klyczek house-- popcorn, pierogies, and petechial hemorrhaging.

73 comments:

  1. Yes.

    This made me laugh and the tiny details intrigued me. They sounded like the mixed up things that go on side by side in a real family home.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes. I'd read more. I like the humor.


    Violet - #29

    ReplyDelete
  3. lol - yes, love the cleverness.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes. Such a strange mix-up that I want to know more.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes - clever, funny, intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, although popcorn and pierogies are a food combo...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes. It's quirky, with specific details that make me really intrigued to get to know this Klyczek family (even their last name is quirky, haha).

    ReplyDelete
  8. No. Although I like the intention - quirky phrasing, amusing alliteration - I stumble over the progression from the simple "popcorn" to the complicated "petechial" and it breaks up the rhythm of the sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No, because I had to google at least two words in the sentence and when I did, I was grossed out :(. Sorry!

    ReplyDelete
  10. It's clever and quirky but it doesn't raise any questions that would make me want to answer by reading on.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No. For me I read with a voice in my head, and it's...a mouthful.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes! I have no idea what pierogies or petechial are, but I believe the MC does, and that's the important thing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No: I had to look up what the words meant.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Yes. I want to know who's been mixing it up and why it happens every Sunday night.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes. It sounds fun, mixing those things together. It's different enough that I definitely want to see what's coming next.
    But, I have no idea what pierogies or petechial mean, and I think it's a little off putting to find things I can't pronounce in just the first sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes. It has a lot of humor and charm to it. I do know what pierogies are, so perhaps that helped.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No. I thought it was clever, but clearly not my kind of book. I'd put it back on the shelf.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yes. I usually don't like to read with a dictionary in hand, but this worked for me.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes, although I was expecting the genre to read mystery rather than YA contemporary. It's fun with great voice.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes. Sounds fun, but found the jump from a slightly difficult-to-pronounce last name to "popcorn" to two other difficult-to -pronounce terms a bit much. Must admit I'm intrigued.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yes. I'm interested and kind of amused. I didn't understand all of the words but my brain just went SCIENCE! and that's enough to keep me going for at least two pages.

    ReplyDelete
  22. YES!
    Great humor and I love the quirkiness. Very intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yes. Definitely. Nice solid hook with great supporting imagery. I want to read on.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No. It has a cleverness to it but it doesn't really flow for me.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Intriguing. The end of the sentence piqued my interest!

    ReplyDelete
  26. No. I really liked where it was going but stumbled over the p-words too much. Wanted more flow.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Interesting beginning! I like the cadence of the alliteration, and the scientific term is intriguing. My only complaint is I'd like to see an em dash instead of two en dashes and a space.

    ReplyDelete
  28. No (sorry!)

    Maybe I shouldn't admit this, but I had to google "petechial" and it took me out of the story.

    ReplyDelete
  29. No. Starting out with words I have to look up (petechial) is not a way to get me to want to read further. It also doesn't sound contemporary.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Yes- because it made me laugh and I can't wait to hear what "petechial hemorrhaging" is!

    ReplyDelete
  31. Maybe (is that cheating?) I like the alliteration and the cleverness, but I got hung up on Petechial and that sort of stops me.

    ReplyDelete
  32. No.

    It's clever and well written but the voice feels kind of middle grade to me.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yes. Cute title, setting, tone, alliteration. It all worked for me.
    Maybe toy with 'Sunday nights are ...' (?)

    ReplyDelete
  34. No. I want to like it, I think I'm supposed to laugh, but the alliteration is overwhelming, and I have no idea what petechial hemorrhaging is. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Yes. I love the voice. I did wonder about the POV, but it didn't stop me. I also wonder if it should be "hemorrhages" as opposed to hemorrhaging" - but maybe that's just me. I'd totally read on, though.

    ReplyDelete
  36. No, but it's more of a taste thing--just doesn't sound like a book I'd personally be interested in.

    ReplyDelete
  37. No. Any time a story opens with words I have to Google, I don't go further.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Yes. Made me laugh and was different. Ithink it's okay that we don't know what the last thing is. That's the hook, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  39. Yes. I've been slammed for using alliteration AND for using unfamiliar/uncommon phrases--but I thought it was funny and intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Yes--I tripped up a little on the tech words, but I think it works since it's probably intentional to create a vibe. Funny, clever. I think a good first line is worth reading a second time to get it.

    ReplyDelete
  41. No. Clever, but makes me stumble.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Yes. That list makes me laugh. I also think this will be an interesting family to read about. Although it's a bit hard to read a difficult last name and a difficult medical term in the same sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yes! All day long, yes. This is fabulous - I get humor, family ethnicity and voice all in one sentence. Bravo!

    ReplyDelete
  44. No- the voice sounded young, yet I had to Google 'petechial."

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yes. Normally I wouldn't read anything involving squick, but this sounds lighthearted enough for me to be interested.

    ReplyDelete
  46. NO
    Sorry, I wasn't sure what half the words meant or how they were pronounced.

    ReplyDelete
  47. Yes. There's a confidence to the writing that's attractive - even if I didn't know all the words. :-)

    ReplyDelete
  48. No. If I had to look up pierogies and petechial to understand the sentence, I imagine most YA readers would have to as well. Even after looking them up, I'm not hooked.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Yes - it is witty and engaging.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Hmm, almost cause I'm not looking up petechial in an opening line.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Yes. Humorous voice. Love the sequence from normal to weird to really weird.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Yes_ Because I want to read the next sentence,duh.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Yes. It sounds funny and leaves me wanting to read on.

    ReplyDelete
  54. NO - the first half had me, but then I had to google some of the second half. A book that starts out with words I don't know breaks my flow.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Yes. Definitely. The goal of your first sentence is to get me to read the second, and I don't have to know what petechial means to know this family's investigating blood evidence over popcorn and ethnic food on a Sunday night. Not your average family activity. Intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Yes. Simply because that strikes me as an unusual family I'd like to get to know better.

    ReplyDelete
  57. A regretful No. Love the humor, but not the word choice. Very close call for me.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Yes, definitely. This made me literally laugh out loud, and I almost never do that. The humor confirmed my impression that the title was meant as a joke, which is good. And maybe it's just a matter of finding the right audience because I think people who watch the kinds of shows you're talking about know what petechial hemorrhaging is.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Yes. I want to know more about this family.

    ReplyDelete
  60. I forgot to add to my yes up there that the pierogies were also part of why I would keep reading, as this type of food generally says something about the family's ethnicity, and I generally find pierogie-eating families interesting!

    ReplyDelete
  61. No. Too many big words. Like the humor though.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Yes--Definitely intriguing. It's not just a teaser line. There's pertinent info there that makes me want to be a fly on the wall in this house.

    ReplyDelete
  63. Yes...and NO! I like the quirkiness of the line but I think, as an opener, it would do better - and be stronger - to just leave it with the, "Sunday night was always forensic night at the Klyczek house", and not try to dress it up or make it 'more interesting' or give it more 'definition'. Let the intrigue of the opening line stand on its own leading the reader to wonder about 'forensics at the Klyczek house???'
    And, btw, forensics is not limited to dead bodies, blood, and bullets, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Yes. I loved being exposed to a new word (petechial).

    ReplyDelete
  65. Yes! Sounds Luke fun, although I don't think I'd join. Blood's gross

    ReplyDelete