Wednesday, August 8, 2012

August First Line Grabber #15

TITLE: The Other Side of Nice
GENRE: YA Contemporary

I once found a photo of my dad’s penis tucked in the back of my parents’ bottom drawer, hidden beneath sweaters and old tax records.

92 comments:

  1. YES: Because when I read it I laughed out loud, and was totally creeped!

    ReplyDelete
  2. No. Good line, but too squicked out by the phrase "my dad's penis."

    ReplyDelete
  3. No. I really don't want to think about my dad even having a penis.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No. Not a good visual for a kid to see their dad's penis. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No. My first thought was 'How does the MC know what his/her dad's penis looks like?' and then I got grossed out.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No. No way. It immediately squicked me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes, I would read more only because I'm curious about how the author will recover from saying 'my dad's penis.' This first line should probably convey a little more disgust or horror, but I'm assuming that comes in sentence two.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No. Would be much better "a photo of a penis." Bringing the dad into it in the first line is a mistake.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes. But I'd have used the last clause, first, or maybe not at all.

    ReplyDelete
  10. No. The image you create with this is just a little too disturbing for me.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No. It's definitely a good line and creeped me out, but I think it's too soon to put something that awkward in the story. Tell us about the MC first.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Yes. But make the sentence shorter. We don't need to know that sweaters were in the drawer.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes. Yikes, my YA self would have been scandalize, but I certainly would have read on.

    ReplyDelete
  14. No. I would put this down, I'm not sure I'd even read the next line.

    Why, oh why in the world would this be the start of a story? I don't see any place this would lead to that I'd want to read.

    ReplyDelete
  15. No. I agree the image of 'dad's penis' was too much, plus then you have the question of how the narrator knew it was the dad's and not someone else's which definitely ups the 'ick' factor. But you have a lot of good things going on here. I wondered why this person was digging through their parent's drawer in the first place. Perhaps if rephrase the start slightly more generically more people would be drawn in. And I disagree with the comment about the sweater. You're setting up the idea this image is tucked away with the unused/out of season/'past' of their lives, very nicely by putting 'sweater' in there, IMO.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No -- sorry, but the squick level came on too suddenly and pushed me right out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. YES because OMG HUMILIATING!!! I gotta know why she was rummaging around in the drawer to lead her to this unfortunate discovery!!

    ReplyDelete
  18. No. 'Penis' and 'Dad' should never be in the same sentence, unless you're V.C. Andrews. Maybe if say something in the vein of 'I once found a nude photo of my dad...' it wouldn't be so icky. On the plus side, I am intrigued and would probably read on.

    ReplyDelete
  19. No. My initial "ugh" reaction would stop me. Perhaps softening it to "I once found a photo of my dad naked" would help. I don't know if this is what you intended, but as is it sounds like his genitalia was the only thing in the photo, which leads to the HIGHLY disturbing question:

    How did she know it was her fathers?

    ReplyDelete
  20. yes. funny and great voice. want to know more - and i love the title

    ReplyDelete
  21. Yes, absolutely yes. Though I wonder if this would be a hard sell as YA.

    ReplyDelete
  22. No, for the same reason B.E. Sanderson noted above.

    ReplyDelete
  23. No. I'm trying to decide if I'm more repulsed or curious, but a start like this doesn't sound like it's going to be the type of story I'd enjoy.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No. Can't get past the dad part. Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes, I'd probably read the next line out of curiousity, but I'd be in a grossed out frame of mind and wouldn't read further if things didn't improve.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No. First of all, ick. Second, how would she/ he know it was her dad's penis? Does it have a label on it or does she/ he know the penis really well?

    ReplyDelete
  27. Yes, funny! The stuff counseling is made of!

    ReplyDelete
  28. No. It was just awkward, dad's penis and YA. Great humor in there but it doesn't hit me as an opening line. Maybe one for later on in the opening. Otherwise all I'm thinking is 'uhhhhh'...

    ReplyDelete
  29. No. Ew. And, like everyone else: how does she know it's her dad's penis, exactly?

    ReplyDelete
  30. No. First sentence didn't really have much uniqueness except for the squick factor.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Yes. Absolutely yes, I personally would have left off the clause at the end. It dilutes the punch.

    ReplyDelete
  32. YES! I'm not a contemporary gal, but I need to know why MC was looking in the drawer in the first place, and what the #### that picture was doing in there. Nice!

    ReplyDelete
  33. No, it was over for me after 'dad's penis.' Sorry.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Yes - the subject matter may not personally be my cup of tea but it grabbed me. I definitely want to read the next line. And there's a market for edgy YA out there.

    ReplyDelete
  35. No. Too graphic for YA- might use slang words for anatomical parts.

    ReplyDelete
  36. No. Seemed like the sentence was all about shock value.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Yes. It's disturbing. It's different. I would read on.

    ReplyDelete
  38. Yes
    It's funny and I'd want to see more of this voice.

    ReplyDelete
  39. No, I couldn't get past "my dad's penis" either, and how did she know it was a photo of her dad's penis, unless the photo showed all of him, in which case, it wasn't just a picture of his penis.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Yes. But I would still get rid of the "penis" and replace it with naked, because THAT wasn't what hooked me.

    What hooked me is: Why the rummaging, and why is there a naked photo in a drawer full of sweaters AND tax returns?

    Who on earth keeps tax returns in a drawer with sweaters?!

    That's what hooked me - so I still say remove penis and replace it with "nude photo"

    ReplyDelete
  41. Yes. Because I want to know why Dad has such a photo.

    ReplyDelete
  42. No -- although it made me laugh, and cringe, I don't know that this works as an opening. It may work later in the story with some context, but right out the gate, I don't know if it would make it through editing!

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yes! I want to look away, but I must keep reading.

    ReplyDelete
  44. No. How does she know it's her dad's? To think she knows what her dad's penis looks like is too creepy.

    ReplyDelete
  45. No with a caveat. I think this is a good sentence, but the ick factor would make me close the book.

    ReplyDelete
  46. No- I just can't get over the question of how would he recognize his dad's penis in a photo? Seems like too much of a leap...a gross leap.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I tried not to read all of the comments before commenting myself, so in case this has been said, I apologize. First off, I don't know if this is a boy or a girl, nor their age when the photo was found. The thought of a story beginning with the discovery of a photo of dad's penis is disturbing to imagine for any child/teen. Next, if she/he knew it was dad, the photo must have included his face, which would make it a nude photo of dad. Not just dad's stuff. Or, if it was only his stuff, it would have to be identified by his name written on the photo or some familiarity for the kid. And I don't want to go there.

    You definitely got my attention, but Dad can't be a part of this. Eew factor.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Yes! Intriguing! I want to know more about this character and what they were searching for.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Yes. Call me crazy, but I enjoy controversy. This is definitely controversial. And it is funny as hell.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Yes.
    Not even sure why but penis and tax records together just say read on a bit to me.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Yes.
    Sounds funny and makes me want to get a bit more story so I can get past the WTF momnent. I read the previous comments and was fascinated by how 99% of them assumed it was a girl without having any justification for that. It may be the eye of the beholder thing but a guy would be just as horrified by dad's ding dong as a girl. But, very fascinating how that is there in almost every comment - "she". Shows how much we bring of ourselves to the work when reading. Poor author!

    ReplyDelete
  52. No. Not sure I want to know why the photo was there. :)

    ReplyDelete
  53. No. This kind of squicked me for reasons noted above: How does the character know the penis in the photo belongs to his/her Dad? Ew. No thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  54. No.
    I wasn't at all squicked, but I don't like it when I feel like writers are just trying to shock me. I don't like feeling like I'm being played.

    ReplyDelete
  55. No, because I don't think the kid should ALREADY know it's his dad's penis, and because I just don't think this is really appropriate for YA. For adult, yeah, I think I'd read on.

    ReplyDelete
  56. Yes. I have an affinity with snoopers and all they don't intend to find.

    ReplyDelete
  57. No. I don't want to know how this narrator knows for certain that "it" is his/her dad's.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Yes! Totally agree with Owl and Carey T.
    Something similar happened to me with a sex book at 12 so I am instantly hooked! Would love to read more :-)

    ReplyDelete
  59. No. The sentence itself feels long and complicated. Perhaps cut at "drawer" it would have a better impact, or if there was more a hint of the character's reaction. Right now I'm not sure how they feel about that.

    ReplyDelete
  60. Yes. Very icky, but very compelling.

    ReplyDelete
  61. My first instinct is YES, because it made me laugh.

    But, Ellie has a point. How does the narrator know it belongs to her/his dad?

    If that one line causes this much controversy, perhaps we have to at least read the first paragraph.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Yes. It's a first line. 3 seconds of your attention bnefore you go onto the 2nd line..and 3rd. It's funny and it means the author and MC might be fun to go along with. Everyone who is trying to say that it is creepy because how does he/she know it belongs to the dad should get a freaking life and look in the mirror. Obviously what you are implying is sexual abuse and molestation which means that is how YOU see the world. Sad, really sadcommentary on where we are as a people and all I can say is whoa! When I read the comments I take note of the names and I think, if that is how your mind works then I don't want YOU anywhere near my kids.

    ReplyDelete
  63. As a teacher, I have to agree with the above. The problem with YA is that it is taregeted at a non-living entity. The real "YA" audience is sexual, active, profane, and has no idea what PC means. Yet, the books that are written for that age group are as the above commenter suggested, sanitized of everything that is in their everyday life. Including, may I add, language, before the bell rings, my toes curl at the language I hear from my students in their discussions with one another - it is really profane. The average "young adult" will be spewing more profanity and talking about more sex than the also average 30 year old man or woman could wrap their head around in a week. So, I think we need to get real and realize that when we say YA what we really mean is we are writing a version of teenagers that would be palatable to a 10-12 year old. Because the real teenagers of that age - dayam, they are not reading us.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Yes. Squeal & ewww! Then of course the question arises: how did she know it was her dad's? Did he tattoo his name on it? Okay, I'm imagining worse than you probably wrote now. It's an attention getting opening line, that's for sure.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Yes. Because it's obviously intriguing/controversial enough for so many people to get into the debate - and I think that merits some exploration!

    ReplyDelete
  66. No. Too angsty-therapeutic-needy. Weirded out, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Hmm. How does she/he know it's Dad's penis? No. Too squeamish about this one.

    ReplyDelete
  68. No. Completey turned off. How does she know it's her dad's penis? Why not just a nude photo of her dad or parents? I feel like the line is for pure shock value.

    ReplyDelete
  69. Most definitely YES! It's a funny image. I want to know not only the kid who remembers this but also the parents who do something like that. Fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Yes.
    Hilarious opening - esp. the justaposition of the tax records. Super.
    (on a side note, I see a lot of comments here saying it is an "ick" factor. Well, wait for the next line. Perhaps it says, "Of course I did not know it then that it was dad's..." etc.
    Anyway, it is funny. All those seeing abuse need to get thee hence without delay to a therapist (and stop watching cable TV)

    ReplyDelete
  71. Yes...but...I agree with commenters who stated take the "dad" out of it in the first sentence. Stating where the MC found it gives mystery. It is definitely shocking and readers will either know immediately if they love it or hate it. No gray area here! : )

    ReplyDelete
  72. No.

    I squicked out. That doesn't often happen to me. Sorry. But I also thought the sentence was too long and the extra clause softened the punch too much. And I wondered how it was identifiably "Dad's."

    ReplyDelete
  73. I know a lot of you are turned off by the squick factor, but if our MC is male, boys and dads often pee together. You know, public restrooms with walls of urinals? Also very helpful in potty training ("See dad, see dad pee.") Males grow up with this and think nothing of it.

    (I already voted yes for it, but I love the controversy it's creating! And it's interesting how us females just assume the MC is a girl.)

    ReplyDelete
  74. I just came from a summer in Greece and Austria. And, on the beaches I was at, the girls were naked and , god forbid,so were the guys. Mom, dad and little Sven and Aphrodite were also as God made them. So, I think this American presumptiom (from women in this case) that "penis" = abuse is th emost disturbing part of this ONE LINE. May I say again...ONE LINE!

    ReplyDelete
  75. No. Not only does this make me dring it has the potential to trigger someone.

    ReplyDelete
  76. No. I wondered how she knew it was her dad's penis. Had she seen it before?

    ReplyDelete
  77. Yes. I'm curious about the snooping, and why the photo is where it is. It didn't squick me out - I read the usual suspects like Forever when I was in middle school.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Yes. Because we've all found *something* in our parents drawer that squicked us out. And I want to see the MCs reaction.

    ReplyDelete
  79. No. It's too gross. How does she know it's her dad's penis?

    ReplyDelete
  80. Once again....all the above commenters need therapy. There is no "she" in the opening line. Maybe it is a girl, maybe it is a boy but we don't know that yet. I am stunned by the assumption and also the first thoughts in the comments. Obviously, this blog has a lot of girls with daddy issues.

    ReplyDelete
  81. No. Not because I'm afraid of the word penis but don't understand the nonchalant attitude - like in assign they ration - once I found a picture of my dad's penis. The tone seems off.

    ReplyDelete
  82. No. Good line but I think it needs some tightening. Also, why would he keep tax records in there? I do like the concept of finding a photo of your dad's wang in a drawer - good conflict.

    ReplyDelete
  83. Since voting is done, I'd like to respond to Owl. I have to say I'm shocked at such a judgmental and accusatory statement being made here. If you look at new YA being published, it's heavily female-centric. If you look at NPR's list of top YA novels, it's about a 60-40 split with the majority of narrators being female. (http://www.npr.org/2012/08/07/157795366/your-favorites-100-best-ever-teen-novels) So it's not a far stretch for many of us to assume the narrator here is female. Questioning how the narrator knows it's his/her father's penis does not mean the commenter has "daddy issues" and needs therapy. Yes, boys grow up seeing their dad's pee, but I doubt my brothers could look at a random penis snapshot and know it was my dad's. In the same way that I, despite growing up changing in front of my mom as a child, wouldn't recognize a random snapshot of boobs and know whether they were hers or not.

    We are judging whether the first line grabbed us as a reader, and why or why not. We are not judging one another. I certainly hope your statements don't prevent blog readers from commenting in the future for fear of such harsh judgment.

    ReplyDelete