Wednesday, August 8, 2012

August First Line Grabber #8

TITLE: Amongst
GENRE: Middle Grade Fantasy

It is not impossible to leave this land, it is impossible to leave with your body still wrapped around your soul.

79 comments:

  1. Yes. It's a nice turn of phrase which suggests the author has good skills.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes. Very interesting and thought provoking first sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No. The sentence feels a little clunky for me, and the voice seems off.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yes. (Sorry for the earlier anonymous comment; please remove it). This first sentence is very thought provoking, and I like the mysterious tone, that makes you want to read more.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Yes. You've set up the idea that leaving is desirable, but doing so is impossible, while instilling the idea that parting soul from body might be a possible thing.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No. It feels awkward. And it feels way too old for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes. It's an awesome concept. I will mention that it seems a little too old for MG though. YA more likely.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No. This confuses me. I would rather have a feeling for the MC first without the author needing to explain what she means by this first sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No. It is confusing, could definitely use some clarification.

    ReplyDelete
  10. No. It feels off. Kind of clunky and not very MG.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No: language is awkward

    ReplyDelete
  12. No -- the sentence feels awkward to me.

    ReplyDelete
  13. No. I was on the fence with this one. I like idea of being unable to leave without losing your soul, but I agree that it doesn't really sound MG.

    ReplyDelete
  14. No.

    My first thought: "What?"

    "Body still wrapped around your soul" gives a very odd picture. And I don't know what you mean, at all. Also, who is talking to who? using "your" sounds like dialog. Or like the narrator is talking to the reader, which if that's the case we should at least know what "land" you're talking about.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes. No. Maybe. Interesting concept, but too wordy/convoluded for a first line in MG.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yes. I love the imagery of a body wrapping a soul.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No. "This land" and "body wrapped around soul" sound like they're trying to be new-agey/old-wisdomey, and I don't think it works, particularly for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Yes, I agree that the sentence is awkward, but the concept is intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Yes. It is an intriguing concept, but it's also a run-on. It needs a "but" or to be broken into 2 sentences.

    But I like "your body still wrapped around your soul."

    ReplyDelete
  20. Yes. Personally, I enjoyed the phrasing. It didn't feel clunky to me - more like a more archaic/fantastic way of speaking. Whether or not it's MG, I still find it intriguing.

    ReplyDelete
  21. No. I like the concept, but I don't like the wording.

    ReplyDelete
  22. No. There are two sentences here so you need a semi-colon or a but or just two sentences.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Yes. I physically raised an eyebrow; that's how intrigued I was.

    ReplyDelete
  24. No. Interesting concept but you wrote two sentences with incorrect punctuation. Thus, you have lost the potential punch and made me fearful of the writing to come.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Yes, I get it and it does intrigue me, but maybe it's a little Eckhart Tolle for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Yes. Having a body wrapped around a soul is a great fantasy image, and since having them separated implies death, it's also a bit foreboding.

    ReplyDelete
  27. No, too complex and preachy for a MG.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Yes. I like where this is going. The voice feels mature for MG, but I'd read on to see.

    ReplyDelete
  29. No
    Flows a little awkwardly and seems kind of melodramatic for a first sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  30. No. I had to reread a couple times to 'get' it. Feels like too much for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Yes. The sentence is almost prose. However, I would break this into two sentences for better flow.

    ReplyDelete
  32. No. Nicely written, but I'm not pulled into the scene at all.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Yes. I would read on, but this might not be a first sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  34. No, I think it's almost there but not quite. It feels vague considering the length of the sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  35. No - seems really heavy handed for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Yes, but it sounds more YA than MG. Powerful image, "...body still wrapped around your soul."

    ReplyDelete
  37. Yes-ish. Yes for the concept but I would consider possibly changing the word order.

    ReplyDelete
  38. No with caveat. I found this poetic, but I had to go back and read a second time to understand the gist. Particularly difficult for a MG. Personal preference, but I don't think the reader should have to work hard on the first sentence - it should be like letting go at the top of a slide.

    ReplyDelete
  39. No. I like the idea, but the sentence is awkward, particularly at the beginning. It would sound better to start off in a positive way, and then close with the negative. "It is possible to leave..., but not with..."

    ReplyDelete
  40. No. I was totally going to say yes until I read it was MG. Too complicated for the age group.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Not quite. I like the idea, but the sentence still needs some tweaking. I don't like the use of 'impossible' twice so close together.

    ReplyDelete
  42. No. Awkward and thus uninteresting.

    ReplyDelete
  43. No.
    Too clunky and wordy for MG. I don't think the concept is easily grasped as described here.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Yes. This was iffy for me. One one hand the wording could be tighter, on the other, I'm intrigued. I chose yes.

    ReplyDelete
  45. No. The sentence is clunky, and the voice seems wrong for MG. Might be better off leaving off the first clause entirely.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Yes. I like the description of the body wrapped around the soul. I'd keep going for a bit to see if it stayed interesting.
    Warning: The comma splice issue nearly tilted things the other way.

    ReplyDelete
  47. No. This would have been a total, enthusiastic yes, had it not been for that MG genre tag.

    ReplyDelete
  48. No--but only because I was confused by it and had to read it twice. If you replace the kind of 'bleh' comma with a dash, I'd have more time to process the contrast. (I didn't get the contrast first time around) Also, 'this land' seems unnecessary to me...

    ReplyDelete
  49. Yes. I like the implication that "this land" is altogether different than any land I'm personally aquainted with. *grin*

    ReplyDelete
  50. No, but only for wording, not idea. Love the idea but found the execution confusing.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Yes, it is a good give and take back, although I think it needs more than a comma. The imagery is vivid. It interests me.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Yes, because there is already a potential conflict source. However, I'm wondering if it sounds too dark for MG?

    ReplyDelete
  53. Yes. It has promise of an interesting conflict and direction of the story. Though, I would replace the comma with an em-dash.

    ReplyDelete
  54. No. Language seems too complicated for MG and too melodramatic for me.

    ReplyDelete
  55. No. The concept seems way too weighty and adult for the opening of an MG book.

    ReplyDelete
  56. No. Sounds kind of heavy-handed for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Yes. I liked the phrase "body still wrapped around your soul." I'm hooked!

    ReplyDelete
  58. No. I really need to start commenting on these things earlier because other people have already mentioned my concerns: heavy-handed, and Beware the Comma Splice.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Yes. Sets up a conflict straight away.

    ReplyDelete
  60. No, I was confused. Maybe just me, though.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Yes. There's plenty of MG out there with complicated ideas and long sentences, especially upper MG, and I think we need to make kids reach with intricate storytelling. That said, maybe opening with the second person pronoun would bring intimacy and immediacy: "You could leave this land, but not with your body still wrapped around your soul." Or skip the first half and write in the conditional: It was going to be impossible to leave this land with (my? Our? her?) body/ies still wrapped..." Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
  62. Yes. Made me wonder if the price for leaving is their soul.

    ReplyDelete
  63. No.

    It sounds to me like it's just stating what happens when you die, only in very complicated language and metaphor (if not, I'd like the "land" named). This seems like a very existential voice for MG, though.

    ReplyDelete
  64. No. Sentence is clunky for me and voice doesn't feel MG

    ReplyDelete
  65. Yes. Love the conflict established right from the start.

    ReplyDelete
  66. No. A bit awkward. Feels like it should be two sentences.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Interesting concept, but not quite there yet.

    ReplyDelete
  68. No. It's interesting, but awkward for a first sentence. I also think it's a bit heavy for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  69. No. The MC is making a statement. He's chatting. Let him do something.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Yes. This seems original and it leaves me wondering what the character means.

    ReplyDelete
  71. No. I'm not big on references to the soul.

    ReplyDelete
  72. No. Wording seems a little mature for MG.

    ReplyDelete
  73. No, because I think this is two sentences. I'd say it's an interesting concept though.

    ReplyDelete