Wednesday, August 8, 2012

August First Line Grabber #2

TITLE: Feathers of Blood
GENRE: YA Slapstick Horror

I hit the kitchen floor off the back stairs with shocking speed and a painful thud, landing flat on my a**.

68 comments:

  1. No: Language not very evocative.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes. I admit I'm intrigued more by the genre than the first line, though. I want to know what slapstick horror is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. No. Because "shocking speed and a painful thud." Also trying to figure out room geography right off the bat makes a rough entry.

    ReplyDelete
  4. No. The voice might be okay, but I can't really tell because I'm really confused about what's happening.

    It also makes me think maybe the author is trying to hard to be attention grabby.

    ReplyDelete
  5. No. Voice isn't strong here, no sense of who this person is and their situation. Plus sentence is awkwardly phrased.

    ReplyDelete
  6. No. The wording is really awkward, and I'm not sure why you needed to say a**.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No. Too much for a first line, pull back a little and give us an idea of what's happening and why.

    ReplyDelete
  8. No. There isn't anything to the line, really, except sometone falling down. I don't feel like I want to read on.

    ReplyDelete
  9. No. The sequence of events doesn't make sense.

    ReplyDelete
  10. No -- the action is a bit confusing, and I don't get a sense of what might be at stake.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No. It's trying too hard to be 'slapstick' and falling short. Like they're trying to describe someone slipping on a banana peel and expecting it to be as funny as seeing it in a Charlie Chaplin movie.

    ReplyDelete
  12. No. Confusing description.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Yes. I'm intrigued enough to see why this character is running.

    ReplyDelete
  14. No, opening with action is great, but this has no context or stakes. Plus the the wording is awkward.

    ReplyDelete
  15. No. I like the idea you've created, but for me there was just too much packed into this one sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  16. No. Too much play by play for an opening sentence.

    ReplyDelete
  17. No. I don't understand this after reading several times. Does he fall off the stairs on to the floor or is the kitchen off the stairs?

    ReplyDelete
  18. No. Sentence is clunky and there is an overuse of adjs. For example: 'Shocking speed' and 'painful thud' is a bit redundant and weakens the impact of your message. To anyone who has ever fallen down the stairs and landed on their ass, we already know its painful. Try replacing with specific action nouns.

    ReplyDelete
  19. No. It felt too clunky; I had difficulty visualize what was really happening with all the conditionals and clauses.

    ReplyDelete
  20. No. Because there is not enough of an MC there. The words 'shocking' seem to come from you the author, not the first person MC.

    ReplyDelete
  21. No, immediate action with not a great impact.

    ReplyDelete
  22. No, but almost. Needs to be simplified.

    ReplyDelete
  23. No. I really, really want to say yes... but since I'm picturing him on a narrow, enclosed flight of stairs and in a kitchen simultaneously, I have to say no.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Yes. It piqued my interest.

    ReplyDelete
  25. No. Lots of words. Confusing.

    ReplyDelete
  26. No,
    I got a little confused by the description. Maybe if you took out "back stairs" and "shocking speed" and added those to a second sentence instead?

    ReplyDelete
  27. No, 'with shocking speed and a painful thud' reads awkwardly to me.

    ReplyDelete
  28. No. Sentence seems too wordy- trying to fit in too much description and if you're going to use a swear word, use it, or don't.

    ReplyDelete
  29. No, too much going on in this first sentence, it muddles the action.

    ReplyDelete
  30. No. Bad writing in this sentence puts me off. But I like the idea of slapstick horror.

    ReplyDelete
  31. No. Way too much. I read it twice just to be sure I had the right mental visual.

    ReplyDelete
  32. No, too many adjectives. The fact that your MC doesn't swear, but does swear, also throws me off.

    I'm not even sure what a "Slapstick Horror" would look like? Is that "Comedy Horror" or "Dark Comedy"?

    ReplyDelete
  33. No, sorry. Too much going on. He/she can hit the ground with a thud (we'll know it's painful), and shocking speed just doesn't work. The mc can race down the stairs and slip with a thud, but no one describes themselves as running with "shocking speed."
    Try to eliminate the adjectives and see how much better it shines. : )

    ReplyDelete
  34. No. I don't care yet about the mc so hearing s/he falls doesn't move me.

    ReplyDelete
  35. No. Too many descriptive words and not enough information.

    ReplyDelete
  36. No. Trying to be funny too soon. Swearing in the first sentence is a big turn-off.

    ReplyDelete
  37. No. Clunky sentence, too many words awkwardly strung together to say nothing interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  38. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  39. No, too wordy for me, but if the sentence was pared down to something like 'I hit the kitchen floor with a thud, landing flat on my a**' then yes.

    ReplyDelete
  40. No.
    Don't like running anywhere to begin and as is the sentence is awkwardly constructed.

    ReplyDelete
  41. No. This doesn't tell me anything about the story or the character.

    ReplyDelete
  42. No. It feels like the real first line is missing, and it comes before this one.

    ReplyDelete
  43. Yes. I'd read the rest of the paragraph, because I like the notion of slapstick horror.

    ReplyDelete
  44. No. This is awkwardly phrased, not sure why it's self-censored, and it's hard to picture the action here.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yes. I think it's hilarious. May be more effective by rewording though...

    "I hit the kitchen floor with a painful thud, landing flat on my ass."

    I'm not sure the back stairs and shocking speed are necessary. I dunno, maybe they are. But I would read more to find out.

    Lots of comments in here with 'no story' and 'doesn't tell me about the character.' You can't tell it all in an opening sentence and you shouldn't try. Your opening sentence works for me. It makes me interested. It makes me interested.

    Take comments with a grain of salt. My entry got kicked to the curb.

    Let's help each other guys, not make each other feel like crap.
    :)

    ReplyDelete
  46. No. I agree that 'shocking speed' and 'a painful thud' are more showing than telling, and I don't know if I can handle knowing about the 'back' stairs (as opposed to the front stairs?) right now. No geography quite yet! I wouldn't keep reading as a buyer, but I would like to know what YA slapstick horror is, so I WOULD offer to be your crit partner. = P

    ReplyDelete
  47. @ White Gardenia
    "Call me Ishmael"
    is considered the greatest opening line in Western Literature. If it were here, it would be eviscerated :) I hear you

    ReplyDelete
  48. No. Too much description of setting and not enough emotion or conflict.

    ReplyDelete
  49. No. The sequence doesn't seem sequential and is a bit confusing. Awkward phrasing.

    ReplyDelete
  50. No. I was confused and the sentence could stand to be a phrase shorter.

    ReplyDelete
  51. No. I think it could be a grabber with a little pruning: I hit the kitchen floor with a painful thud, landing flat on my a**. You could add the other details later.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Yes. I was intrigued to read more and the genre interests me.

    ReplyDelete
  53. No. I'm not sure what happened here, so the picture is muddled. Did she hit the floor on her feet and then slip or did she hit the floor on her a**? Who was shocked by her speed? If she was shocked... why? What generated the painful thud? It seems to have happened simultaneously with hitting the floor and before the landing flat.

    ReplyDelete
  54. No. What's shocking speed? I'd rather see a metaphor. Profanity in the first line is turn-off.

    ReplyDelete
  55. No. Having trouble visualising the back stairs finishing up in the kitchen when my head is trying to tell me they would terminate in a corridor leading to the kitchen. Also, shocking speed seems an odd description.

    ReplyDelete
  56. No.

    The staging seemed awkard ("off the back stairs") and the description was a tad overwrought ("shocking speed and a painful thud."

    ReplyDelete
  57. No. It's a humorous opening and I don't mind the a**, but it reads awkward. Maybe if you cut "off the back stairs" it would help.

    ReplyDelete
  58. No. Someone fell. I want more.

    ReplyDelete
  59. Yes. I like starting with action. It's a little awkward, the 'shocking speed' jolted me and I had to read it again - it just didn't flow. I want to know what the MC is running from and the consequences of the fall.

    ReplyDelete
  60. No. It made me giggle, but it doesn't tell me much.

    ReplyDelete
  61. No. I think I'd like the voice of this, but this first sentence was disjointed.

    ReplyDelete
  62. No, but I do like the idea of opening with some good action. Just don't like the sentence.

    ReplyDelete